The Shape of Water Review
After watching the Oscars, I was excited that Guillermo Del
Toro’s The Shape of Water won Best Picture. I hadn’t seen the movie at the
time, but I was just excited that a science fiction movie won the award. I
decided to watch it the next night and boy was I disappointed. I don’t normally
agree with the movies that win Best Picture, and I’ve come to accept that. My
favorite movies of the year just don’t align with what the Oscar’s have in
mind, and I get that. But I didn’t find anything particularly amazing or unique
about The Shape of Water, honestly, I thought it was a tale as old as time.
The shape of Water is pretty much a retrofuture/steampunk
reimagining of Disney’s Beauty and the Beast. Its protagonist is a young,
brunette girl with a specific attribute to set them apart from society (Belle
with her intelligence, and Elisa being mute). Both films took place during a
time period where it was difficult for women to be independent, but both
characters still manage to do so. At home, they live with an older man who fails
at his job (Maurice being deemed an insane inventor, and Giles not succeeding
as a painter). The physically strong testosterone fueled macho man as the main antagonist.
The female lead falling in love with a creature that people don’t understand
and are afraid of, but in actuality, is caring and loving once you get passed
the monster-like exterior.
From my understanding, there was supposed to be some
enlightening realization moment at the end of the movie, where we learn Elisa
is some sort of human/fish hybrid, but it felt lame, obvious, and just left us
with more questions than answers. At the start of the film we see Elisa with 3
scars on each side of her neck, and my immediate reaction was “hmm, they look
like gills.” We learn in the finale that The Asset “healed” her scars and
turned them into gills so she could breathe underwater. First off, it was
obvious from the very beginning that they were gills. 3 slits on each side of
her neck? That’s way too coincidental to be just a coincidence. Secondly, that
leaves us with a plethora of unanswered questions. Were her parents a fish
creature and a human? Was she created in a lab? How did she get to Baltimore? Are
there more amphibious monsters? The twist didn’t reveal anything that wasn’t
already alluded to, so it felt unnecessary.
There were a few spins put on the film to make it stand out
a little, like Elisa and The Asset communicating through sign language, and the
Russian spy subplot, but it still felt like the movie was just one overused
trope after the other. Despite winning the award for Best Picture, The Shape of
Water wasn’t anything that special, so I’m giving it a 6/10.
Comments
Post a Comment